Because the bone crest constitutes the base for the soft tissue, alterations in the peri-implant bone level will affect the position of the soft tissue gun self defence manuals pdf margin, which in turn will have a significant impact on the aesthetic outcome of the implant therapy (.
This fact could be due to the implant type: in fact the SFB has a reverse conical head that allows for an increased volume of crestal bone around the implant neck.
About 1 year) where post-surgical crestal bone remodeling effect is higher. 1,.P.U. .This website is best viewed using Internet Explorer 9, Chrome, Safari and newer browsers.An additional reason for alveolar crest bone resorption between implants could be microgap between implant and abutment.Because the SFIs are on the market since the last 10 years and no report is available on the effect of implants distance on crestal bone resorption, we decide to perform a retrospective study on a series of SFIs to analyze their clinical outcome.In its most simplified form, biological width refers to the height of the junctional epithelium and connective tissue attachment, located between the base of the sulcus and the alveolar bone crest, and it is defined as the distance necessary for a healthy existence of bone.Garber., 2001 ).19.92.0002 Edentulness.07.7864 Antagonist.01.3160 Open in a separate window In multivariate analysis (i.e.Twenty-seven fixtures were inserted in post-extractive sockets and the remaining 32 in healed bone; 36 (61) were immediately loaded.Intel, the Intel Logo, Intel Inside, Intel Core, and Core Inside are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the.S.
This result can be due to the short follow-up (i.e.
The spiral implant family (SIF) is composed by two types of implants, the Spiral Implant (SPI) and the Spiral Flare Bevel (SFB).Keywords: Implant, Tooth, Width, Resorption, Biology.Independent samples T-test, univariate and multivariate analysis were used to detect those variables associated with the clinical outcome.In univariate analysis (i.e.This results are different to those previously reported by Saadoun., which recommended to keep a distance of 2 mm between cervical implant face and natural tooth and greater than 3 mm cervical distance between two implants to minimize the amount of crestal bone loss (.(1998) found that approximately.2 years after prosthetic restoration, bone loss of more than 3 mm was observed in implants of different types where the microgap was located in a subgingival position, whereas completely different results were obtained when the location of the microgap was.No statistical difference was detected between implant subtypes.It has been hypothesized that a certain width of the peri-implant mucosa is required to enable a proper epithelial-connective tissue attachment and, if this soft tissue dimension is not satisfied, bone resorption will occur to ensure the establishment of attachment with an appropriate biological width.Our data do not detect significant statistical difference in crestal bone resorption over time between fixtures inserted at lower or higher distance than.8 mm.Materials and Methods, fifty-nine implants were investigated with a mean follow-up of 14 months.The epithelium could migrate beyond the bacteria and the microgap in an attempt to isolate the infection.This could due to the specific implant used that has a reverse conical neck.Among the other studied variables (i.e.Have a significant p value.Albrektsson and Zarb, 1998 ) are related to a good clinical outcome, we detected two groups of implants: 27 implants had good clinical outcome (peri-implant crestal bone resorption.77.32 mm) whereas 32 failed (1.81.27 mm).